Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PKP class SM01

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to DRG Kleinlokomotive Class I. I'm not willing to close as merge as there are a grand total of 0 references for this content. Daniel (talk) 20:00, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PKP class SM01

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

PKP class SM01 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced stub about a locomotive model. WP:GNG does not appear to be met, particularly given the infobox claim that only three models were produced. Perhaps this kind of stuff can survive on some list, but given lack of sources, hard to merge anything. Pl wiki (currently at AfD there) has a reliable reference but is used just for the weight parameter, not even present in our article. My BEFORE yielded nothing of use. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation, Germany, and Poland. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:43, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment related to de:DRG Kleinlokomotive Class II, maybe a merge with a redirect? --Ouro (blah blah) 06:17, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ouro Merge would require sources. Redirect would require mentioning this in the other article (with a reference, per WP:V). If this can be done, sure. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:56, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:56, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge with DRG Kleinlokomotive Class II: Polish wiki only has one book source, and is basically a paragraph-length article. Merging to the main German locomotive article should be fine. Oaktree b (talk) 13:42, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• possibly merge to DRG Kleinlokomotive Class I (note difference) but at this point prefer TNT delete. The big problem: I don't know if I can trust any of the information in the article (the Polish WP article isn't an improvement). The class II article seems to be the wrong target as the pictured locomotive isn't like those in that article, whereas it is plausibly similar to that depicted in the Class I article. At this point I think starting over with decent sourcing is the best option. Mangoe (talk) 15:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.