- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shimeru (talk) 22:37, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I was the original creator of the article, and was looking back over it to see if I could make it less of a stub, but I couldn't find enough material in the sources I listed to do this. The sources were either not notable themselves, or didn't mention PLCash as being noteworthy in some way. I have searched around again today and still have not been able to find any better sources describing PLCash. Short of dubiously loading the article with excessive amounts of OR, I don't think I could add anything worthwhile to it. With this in mind, I've re-nominated this article for deletion.
I messed up the Afd tagging a bit, this will actually be the article's 2nd time being nominated for deletion, the first being 5 August 2009. -- Brandished (talk) 21:25, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:38, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I concur, there isn't much out there to confirm notability. On point of procedure, this article was proposed for deletion via the WP:PROD process, and that was declined (here) when sources were added. This is the first actual AFD on the article. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 14:37, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.