- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. alphaChimp(talk) 00:12, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable neologism. Prod removed by author. No google hits for POIP with the explanation, or POIP with the inventor of the neologism. Fails thus WP:V Fram 08:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Ioannes Pragensis 09:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete dumb. Danny Lilithborne 10:28, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. MER-C 11:28, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - "serves no useful purpose". That'll do for me. BTLizard 12:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Plain Old Internet Phooey. Onebravemonkey 12:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per above: confusing, and no one is going to look this up. - Smerdis of Tlön 16:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.