- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:21, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- POSIM (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of WP:notability. No independent WP:reliable sources. Google searches not showing anything significant. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 16:54, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No notability. While the company shows up high in a Google search for Mac POS software, the company's product, it does not seem to have many customers. I also did not find any independent sources. --Aftonj1993 (talk) 19:36, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 13:29, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Article because POSIM is notable because there are over 5,000 small retailers who use POSIM in their daily operations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaydell (talk • contribs)
- Comment Do you have a source for this? Or is it just another unsubstantiated claim? Note that even if 10,000 people were using it unless it got significant coverage in independent WP:reliable sources it would not be considered WP:notable. noq (talk) 23:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No indication of notability, no notable coverage in reliable 3rd party sources. Dialectric (talk) 15:15, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.