Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PROJECT GIUDELINES
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete as a test page. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:06, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
- PROJECT GIUDELINES (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Test page by new account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djembayz (talk • contribs) 23:50, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
- If you meant to mark the article for speedy deletion as a test page, you need to place that template on the article itself, not the AfD page. Conifer (talk) 00:12, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- I Support deleting, because it looks like spam created by Djembayz. --Stranger195 (talk • contribs • guestbook) 00:16, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- I did not create the page. This was my first time attempting to do a speedy deletion with the page curation tool, and it hasn't worked. Couldn't fix the speedy deletion tag in the article when I found the error, the display turned into junk. Have removed tag from this page. Can you show me how this is done? --Djembayz (talk) 00:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.