Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PRQA QA·C and QA·C++

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:02, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PRQA QA·C and QA·C++

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. I prodded it under the same reason but the PROD was pulled by an IP. Googling for "Programming Research Ltd" gives me nothing but user-submitted content and their website. TKK ^{bark !} 16:21, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- The company appeaars to be Programming Research Ltd and the article should be there. PRQA apparently a trading name, but as an abbreviation, it should only exist in WP as a dab-page or redirect. QA·C and QA·C++ appear to be prducts, and should not be in the title at all, since this article is about the company, not the products. No view on merits of article. Peterkingiron (talk) 08:37, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 15:19, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.