Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PSP Firmware list
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:04, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Listcruft Computerjoe's talk 16:23, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There are valid reasons for the deletion of this article, but listcruft isn't one of them. More to the point, this article is probably a copyvio of some sort, and doesn't have sources. In addition, listing changelogs on Wikipedia is just plain stupid: it would be far more effective to link to a website covering this information (the link would of course go in the main article). Delete. Dark Shikari 16:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT (arbitrary information). By the way, Dark Shikari- I think that your reasons for deletion are exactly the issues Computerjoe had with the article, just in a shorter, lazyfingers way of saying it. :) --Kuzaar-T-C-
- Probably ;). I guess people citing essays and nothing else as grounds for deletion is just my little pet peeve at the moment. Dark Shikari 19:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Lazy fingers or not, a nomination for deletion should lay out a proper reason so it is clear why the article is nominated. -- Whpq 19:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Probably ;). I guess people citing essays and nothing else as grounds for deletion is just my little pet peeve at the moment. Dark Shikari 19:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The whole thing appears to be lifted from the PSP support site see here. -- Whpq 19:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --Bigtop 20:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang (raves/review me!) 21:21, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above --Peephole 15:59, 4 August 2006 (UTC)--[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.