Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PTWS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. The page was deleted by LadyofShalott per CSD G3 (blatant hoax). Non-admin closure. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 14:23, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

PTWS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined PROD. Concern was: Neologism with no evidence of actual usage. May also be a hoax. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:51, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as original prodder. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:02, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 01:23, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 01:23, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete per G3, blatant hoax.Novangelis (talk) 01:39, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete Clearly a joke. --MelanieN (talk) 01:45, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Obviously WP:MADEUP. Msnicki (talk) 02:13, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delete - WP:NOT. →Στc. 03:16, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Article is an neologism and lacks reliable third party sources. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 04:11, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.