Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pablo Hell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:36, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pablo Hell

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Pablo Hell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a musician that doesn't meet WP:NMUSICBIO and WP:GNG. The sources are mostly PR pieces, this is one. Definitely not notable at this point. Jamiebuba (talk) 22:44, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, and Germany. Jamiebuba (talk) 22:44, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Nothing for the musician, he has an upcoming EP, perhaps too soon. Oaktree b (talk) 23:23, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the page with more sources and I did go back and double-check, it appears he could qualify for notability as he has been frequently mentioned in just one year for a notable sub-genre of music, trap hip-hop. Some of the articles are press release, but many do bring up past feats and discussion as to why he is a notable subject. LLVKAS (talk) 00:22, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Deletion contested on article talk page so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:52, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment That particular music genre is not in my wheelhouse, so I can't comment how RS the new sources are. Oaktree b (talk) 00:22, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:42, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:TOOSOON, small artist and only has 2.8k monthly listings. In the future he could become notable, not now though.`~HelpingWorld~` ^(👽🛸) 21:25, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete upcomimg not notable at this point fails WP:NMUSICBIO and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:30, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.