- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:04, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- PageCarton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I placed a WP:PROD on a previous instance of this article, with a rationale of "No evidence that this newly-released software has attained notability." The article is sourced only to a primary site and Github, and my searches are identifying nothing better, so I am bringing this to AfD on the same rationale as the previous Prod. AllyD (talk) 13:55, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 13:59, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 03:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- "Delete' Concur with nom. I could not find a single valid reference. MB (talk) 00:19, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.