- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Pai lum (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an article about a non-notable martial art. It's only source is the organization's home page. There is no indication it meets any notability criteria. Article was PRODed 3 months ago and recently restored. The talk page shows there is little independent support for many of this style's claims and history. Astudent0 (talk) 19:37, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. (listed 19:41, 5 March 2012 (UTC)) — Frankie (talk) 16:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I didn't find any reliable sources to show this style meets WP:MANOTE. The article seems to be full of unsourced claims and comments and has no independent sources. Papaursa (talk) 04:08, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This article gives no reason why it's subject is notable and has no independent sources. Mdtemp (talk) 15:35, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Joaquin008 (talk) 20:42, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.