- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete, copyvio. Kimchi.sg (talk) 04:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Paint_America (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable, essentially promotional; orphan/lack of citation/notability templates have been sitting on the page for a while Ex0pos (talk) 08:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Spam. Joe Chill (talk) 21:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:02, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no significant coverage. Werner Heisenberg (talk) 02:28, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Let's paint over this in white so we have a blank canvas... I mean Delete. Non-notable spam article. Hamtechperson 03:16, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I just tagged this as a copyvio of [1], which it mostly cut-and-pastes from and in part closely paraphrases. In the event it's not speedy deleted, I !vote delete for lack of notability as explained above. Glenfarclas (talk) 03:30, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.