- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- PaintballChat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete This was prodded by another user for "Article does not establish third party notability. Article lists no notable information for network. Possible COI. Article believed inappropriate for wikipedia "and was removed by an anon IP (who has not made any edits besides this so far) with no explanation. I considered reverting this edit, but I wasn't sure if this goes against policy, so I'm nominating it for deletion on AFD instead. CyberGhostface (talk) 00:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Reverting would have gone against WP:PROD; AfD is the right venue. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 04:08, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - assuming WP:WEB applies to IRC networks this seems to gratuitously fail it. Seems to be no evidence of notability through coverage in reliable sources. ~ mazca talk 10:20, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Additionally, you were correct not to revert - WP:PROD exists for non-controversial deletions, if anyone objects then it's evidently controversial and AfD is the right place. ~ mazca talk 10:20, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per mazca. -- GarbageCollection - !Collect 15:46, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I couldn't find any coverage in reliable news sources, such as Google news. — Wenli (reply here) 21:27, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all reasons above.Virek (talk) 03:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all. Darrenhusted (talk) 11:37, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What is considered a reliable source? Reliable news sources for the paintball community have published press releases for the network, I fail to see how these are not "reliable sources"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Snake6 (talk • contribs) 16:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No reliable sources in the sense that we use the term on Wikipedia. EdJohnston (talk) 19:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.