Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paintbrush (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Paintbrush (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable software article full of images which should also probably be deleted. Wackymacs (talk ~ edits) 21:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Non-notable software, lists itself as a copy of other software, and no references. TN‑X-Man 21:38, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Just being open source isn't notability. Probably best to redirect to Paint (software), as Paintbrush is the former name of the Windows equivalent. --Dhartung | Talk 21:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Doesn't show notability. Soxred 93 02:44, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above WP:N. Amor amor (talk) 11:48, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep - appears to be notable (even if no real claim is made), although article is very poorly written --T-rex 13:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • What makes it "appear" notable, exactly? — Wackymacs (talk ~ edits) 15:34, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.