Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pale Moon (software)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 19:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Pale Moon (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable modification of Firefox. No sources are provided, and after searching I found no news articles or reliable reviews. It's been given multiple 'awards' from file hosting websites, which are unreliable. It fails WP:GNG. Pale Moon (song) should be moved back to Pale Moon if this article is deleted. Mephtalk 03:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. Doesn't seem to assert notability at all. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:16, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I would have suggested merging into Firefox, but there isn't even anything to merge. —Tim Pierce (talk) 00:57, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As per Tim Pierce. Nipsonanomhmata (Talk) 10:38, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment—Article updated with primary sources; still no reliable third-party sources. Mephtalk 15:44, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.