Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paliuli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 04:50, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This was one of the 50+ Polynesian mythology articles submitted in a big batch (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahoeitu). After much discussion at that afd, I'm re-submitting all of the items individually. Some of them may be keepers, most of them will be deletable. I'm deferring to editors such as User:Kahuroa and User:Bucketsofg who have been looking onto these articles as to which is which. Grutness...wha? 02:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, wasn't this nominated on AfD and verified yesterday? Anyhow, Encyclopedia Mythica has an article on the above subject--TBC^{??? ??? ???} 03:15, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: yes, the whole series was pulled and we're reconsidering them one at a time. Bucketsofg 04:28, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Further comment. The whole problem with many of these articles was that Encyclopedia Mythica seems to be largely made up on the spot. It seems to be an extremely unreliable source. Grutness...wha? 06:02, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another comment, Just checked and it seems that Encyclopedia Mythica entrees aren't made on the spot, but based on user contributions, sort of like (ironically) Wikipedia --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 07:29, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Verified by sources now cited in entry. Bucketsofg 04:28, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as verified by bucketsofg. Capitalistroadster 08:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, verifiable. --Terence Ong 09:10, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as above. Kahuroa 11:43, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep agree Barry Zuckerkorn 19:08, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Since I'm the one who added the references to this. Crypticfirefly 03:26, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.