- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:00, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Pamu pamorada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD was contested. No reliable sources. Yeknom Dnalsli (expound your voicebox here) 07:23, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:33, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Somebody subsequently created essentially the same article with the correct capitalization: Pamu Pamorada. – Wdchk (talk) 17:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Conditional redirect to Pamu Pamorada (if the other article is kept) orDelete(if the other article is also deleted). Well I am from the same province as her, so maybe I shouldn't be too harsh on her. Nevertheless, there aren't enough reliable sources about her just yet (except Push.com.ph, which is an ABS-CBN affiliated site but is nevertheless considered reliable), so at most this is probably a case of WP:TOOSOON. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:43, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- As the conditional redirect part above was dependent if the other article would be kept naturally, as I was unaware that it had already been PRODed, and later AFD'd, I will now strike out that part of the !vote. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 22:59, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I'm also adding the other article (the one with proper capitalization), because if this one goes, the other one must go as well. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:45, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both. The only fact which is sourced to anything other than Twitter and Wikipedia is that she is to undertake "her first acting project". That does not constitute evidence of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:02, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete both. Same with JamesBWatson's reason.--Renzoy16 | Contact Me 17:51, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Both ~ Andrew Kurish (talk) 22:11, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.