- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. (Nomination withdrawn - nominator !voted keep) —SpacemanSpiff 06:14, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Pandippada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to fail WP:FILM. I cleaned it up, but I can't find adequate sources for it to pass WP:GNG, and it doesn't have many nationally known reviews, as far as I can tell, although it is quite often mentioned on blogs and the like. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 05:26, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Salih (talk) 07:04, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. With the new sources added by Salih, it passes WP:GNG. I have added some more references. The refs are from The Hindu, Deccan Herald and Sify, which meet the "nationally known" criteria. Other reviews i can find are Galatta, Indiaglitz, One india, Hindustan Times (behind paywall), musicindia. For searching use alternate spelling "Pandipada" or the malayalam term "പാണ്ടിപ്പട". --Sodabottle (talk) 08:30, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- --Sodabottle (talk) 16:56, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Thanks, I couldn't seem to find anything. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 17:29, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- you are welcome. i have run into exactly the same problem before. the more popular the vernacular film (Tamil, Telugu or Malayalam), the more coverage it has on blogs, forums and fansites and they obscure the reliable source google hits. :-)--Sodabottle (talk) 17:34, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: This article has now enough links, an image, all the cast and a good description of the plot. --Sreejith K (talk) 06:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.