Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parallel Dimensions (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Parallel Dimensions (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatantly non-notable; I've just prodded the article on the musician responsible. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:50, 22 September 2009 (UTC) Orange Mike | Talk 20:50, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I can't find any reliable sources that discuss this album ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 23:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. No notability here. Drmies (talk) 23:23, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete non-notable --3^0$0%0 1@!k (0#1®!%$ 17:49, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Being non-notable is not a speedy deletion criteria. Please reread on them. A7 applies to subjects (not including albums, books, software or other creative works) that do not assert notability. talkingbirds 22:02, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, fails WP:NALBUMS for lack of reliable, third party sources. Does not seem to have charted. talkingbirds 22:02, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.