Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parametric innovation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:17, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Parametric innovation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. The two refs, one is on tables (as in furniture) in the classroom, the other is a password protected blog, so either not reliable or not on the topic (or possibly both). Reads like something someone made up themselves, possibly the same author as the hidden blog. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 03:32, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability very questionable, content so vague as to be useless, insufficient sources.-- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 09:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:COATRACK. One source being password-protected is not really an issue (as long as it is published to a relatively large audience, like paywalled research papers are), but the original url of the ref is at *.wordpress.com which strongly implies that the end url is a WP:SPS. The "table" ref is hardly well-written, as well as not mentioning "parametric innovation" even once.

The term does return some hits: [1], [2]. But even if these were enough for a standalone article (I think not), the current article has a whole other definition (those hits say it is basically synonymous with "incremental innovation"). Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 09:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.