Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paranormal Activity 5

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:RHaworth under criterion G3. (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 13:29, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paranormal Activity 5

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced possible future film. No indication of notability. Previous version had a reference that inferred the existence of the film based on a ___domain name being registered. noq (talk) 06:58, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are not just a deficiency of sources, there are none! - fails WP:SOURCES. Since it doesn't exist and is not "slated for release" until 2014 (at best or even if at all), it becomes a matter of WP:SPECULATION and is therefore WP:NN. WP:NOTADVERTISING states Wikipedia is not an advertising/promotion house for pending and/or speculative releases. Яεñ99 (talk) 07:21, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are no sources that officially state that there will be a fifth movie and a search brings up mostly theory that there will be a fifth movie but it's all speculation. [1] Will there be one? Probably, as the previous three have done well enough to create a fourth and since they're cheap to churn out, they'll keep going until the movies bomb in theaters ala Blair Witch 2. Speculation isn't enough for an article, so this should be deleted as a hoax article. Besides, the tone of the movie plot isn't even in keeping with the theme of the series and the release date is off from the series' traditional Halloween release, so I'm going to say that this is all a hoax and could be speedied as such.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:28, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer, the user appears to have added a hoax movie article to Wikipedia in the past, so some action should probably be taken.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:29, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(slaps forehead) I forgot about the whole WP:HOAX page and the warning. User has been issued a warning.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:37, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Close its already deleted or doesn't even exist. Bleubeatle (talk) 12:06, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.