Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parents and Children Together

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:54, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Parents and Children Together (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about regional organiation that does not meet requirements of WP:NONPROFIT. GIS indicates there are scores of organizations in many countries operating at state, provincial, municipal or other levels using this same name. The website for the subject of this article confirms its regional nature. No notable news coverage is apparent for this org. Possibly a self-promotion page, as it was originally a re-direct to another organization until changed by User:PACTcharity, which is that user's only contribution. If not deleted, it should be changed back to its original version as a re-direct to its original target. Agent 86 (talk) 10:44, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 22:22, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Doesn't meet WP:ORG as a regional organisation that lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. The name of the organisation is common as mentioned by the nominator which confounds the search. -- Whpq (talk) 16:51, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.