Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Partap Chauhan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:43, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Partap Chauhan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no significant credibility for the notability in fact the subject fails to meets the Wikipedia's notability criteria -- as per verifiability which says the facts and information should be verifiable from the independent and reliable sources. In case of this article, it seems that most of the details is cited from the primary sources which could be phony or promotional. — Sanskari ^Hangout 10:17, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 10:18, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 10:18, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 10:18, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Sanskari ^Hangout 10:18, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Salt as this is an advertisement and that's what the deletion was for in 2010, and there's nothing here for professors notability either. SwisterTwister talk 20:42, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Negligible cites on GS. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:18, 5 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete as spam; the affiliated Jiva Ayurveda articles was deleted in 2014. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:08, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now. Subject is not an academic, so it is obvious he would fail WP:PROF. He is a doctor specialised in traditional Indian system of medicine, called Ayurveda (not Ph.D doctor). Coming to N word, he may meet GNG or at the very least BASIC; one needs to dig up quality sources and re-write the article from scratch though. He has received coverage in reliable sources from 1998 up to this year. (Please do not rely on Google search results for India-related topics, instead use custom search engines listed at WP:INDAFD). And I do not see repeated abuse of creation for this topic, so imo salting is unnecessary. Anup [Talk] 14:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-Purely promotional and negligible citations on GS.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 10:57, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete abuse of WP to promote a celebrity doctor wannabe. Jytdog (talk) 05:01, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
WP:TNT delete. Obvious case of WP:PROMOTION: basically a list of achievements and nothing more. The only really biographical section is completely unsourced. --HyperGaruda (talk) 06:55, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.