Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Particles of Truth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades^Godric 03:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Particles of Truth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be a notable film. No claims of notability, and the references are to the films own (defunct) website or directory sites like IMDb. The awards don't appear to be significant and have no independent sourcing. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:54, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 19:06, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 19:06, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Rotten Tomatoes shows it has been fully reviewed in multiple reliable sources here including Variety, Hollywood Reporter, New York Post, Village Voice, Slant Magazine and the article quotes a Los Angeles Times review (that link is down and will try to fix it later.) Overall it passes WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 15:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- In addition to the reviews mentioned by Atlantic306 this film is discussed in at least one film guidebook: Beyond Bergman: The New Age of Independent and Foreign Films, 1990-2009. Clear keep. 192.160.216.52 (talk) 16:42, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.