- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, WP:NOT a crystal ball. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 18:42, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was tagged as a copyvio from http://www.salmankhan.net/forthcoming/Partner.asp, but a few random searches show no violations. So I'm bringing it here instead. It may be too early to write as it can still fall through. On the other hand, the source is reliable. No vote. - Mgm|(talk) 12:12, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment When I tagged it as speedy G12 (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Partner_%282007%29&oldid=90639190), the entire article was a direct copy&paste. If you look at the edit history, now the author has gone through and rephrased each sentence with a similarly meaning one. Whether this is enough for it to still be a copyvio or not, I don't know ShakingSpirittalk 12:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Still in breach of WP:COPYVIO policy; simple paraphrasing of a single source is not acceptable.--Anthony.bradbury 00:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, the main paragraph is almost identical to one from the cite, but just a small fraction of the text has been copied. Personally I don't think this is the kind of articles we should have in WP, but they are here so I'll have to pass. -- Steve Hart 15:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, —— Eagle 101 (Need help?) 22:16, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:NOT a crystal ball. A scan of Sohail Khan and Govinda (actor) suggests that the film will probably generate an article if it's released, but the information presented here is too skimpy. There simply doesn't appear to be enough information from relaible sources to create an article (even IMDB is holding off). Mr Stephen 23:18, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above; it should be recreated when more information becomes available. Cbrown1023 00:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.