- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- PasWiki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A non-notable wiki application, whose only interesting aspect seems to be that it's written in Pascal. It appears to have only one developer and one user. Yaron K. (talk) 23:56, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete! - no indication of notability, none, zero, nada, zip. Not even a HINT of notability. This article has as much merit as an article saying "Fifi is a poodle owned by my neighbor Mrs. Rosenberg." The fact that this can't be speedied is evidence of how constipated wikipedia has become. --96.233.40.199 (talk) 00:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 01:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This seems like it could have been a {prod}, since there does not seem to be any claim of notability in the article. LotLE×talk 01:52, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 03:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I couldn't find any coverage, let alone significant coverage. --RrburkeekrubrR 14:48, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.