- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:31, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Pascal Etcheber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail WP:NACADEMIC. – Ploni (talk) 18:58, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Philosophy. Ploni (talk) 18:58, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and France. Shellwood (talk) 19:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- I thing WP:GNG is the guideline to use here (and which the subject appears to fail) rather than WP:NACADEMIC. The subject is a management consultant with a degree, as most of them have, not a "philosopher". Phil Bridger (talk) 13:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Fair point. I agree that he seems to fail WP:GNG too in any case. –Ploni (talk) 13:18, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Meets neither academic nor general guidelines. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 14:41, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.