Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PassAlong Networks
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Jaranda wat's sup 20:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- PassAlong Networks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Previously tagged for speedy deletion by Spellcast as blatant advertising (G11) and speedy-deleted by myself. I restored the article after a user contested it, and now I'm listing it here to see if we can come to some consensus on this article. SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:19, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep They have notability Corpx 17:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - The article does a sufficient job implying the company's notability. However, seems to have some NPOV issues. And a lot of superfluous information. Reads like a company brochure. Douglasmtaylor 00:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep - There is enought reliable source material independent of PassAlong Networks from which to develop an article composed of a neutral and unbiased compilation of previously written, verifiable facts. The present article is not neutral, unbiased, and verifiable but it could be rewritten from existing reliable source material to be neutral, unbiased, and verifiable. Hopefully this AfD will send a message to those interested in the article to fix it. If the article is not fixed and nominated for AfD, this first AfD plus the failure to follow the consensus in this AfD would tip the scale to Delete. -- Jreferee (Talk) 23:26, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wikipedia really doesn't need to contain an advert for every small or medium sized company in the world. The sole contributor to the article has made no attempt to disguise the fact that it is an advert. Thehalfone 11:03, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.