- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 23:39, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
None of the articles linked on this disambiguation page exist. If there are no Wikipedia articles on the different types of patch clamps, a disambiguation page is unnecessary. Simpatico 08:55, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep & Clean Up. I discoverd that Planar patch clamp existed and fixed the link on the page. If classical and planar are similar items (I have no idea) it might be better to redirect this page to Planar patch clamp for now. But if these two things are very different, perhaps this is a helpful disamb. Any know what these things are?Obina 10:25, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- no problem. Just needs expansion. - Longhair 10:26, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep apparently verifiable, but watch for linkspam since there seem to be a number of proprietary terms creeping in. Maybe my spam radar is just a bit twitchy today ;-) Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 13:53, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Patch clamp this thing right back into Wikipedia. ... oh, how I loathe myself --Cyde Weys votetalk 18:50, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.