- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 00:22, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
advertising - content is identical to linked website Jamoche 02:30, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Also AfD PathChirp which has nearly identical content - if these aren't deleted, one should be a redirect Jamoche 02:34, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom --Deville (Talk) 02:38, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as advertising. (If it isn't advertising it's copyvio.) —porges(talk) 02:46, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment No copyright notice on the original page. Fan1967 03:05, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Content is automatically under copyright whether notified or not. Read copyright. —porges(talk) 03:28, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per above. Wickethewok 03:54, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - ditto. - Richardcavell 09:36, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It is a copyvio, and has been tagged and sent to WP:CP. Stifle (talk) 09:44, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.