Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pathfinder Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:13, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pathfinder Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. WP:CORP. Cannot find significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, only trivial and incidental coverage of subject by secondary sources. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:18, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and is nothing more than a promotional ad for the company. Should have been speedied as a G11. §FreeRangeFrog 22:14, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 23:08, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not notable. — ṞṈ™ 22:34, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete completely lacking independent refs. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:32, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.