Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Colleary
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 21:59, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Patrick Colleary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete, both as creator of article and for, in retrospect, non-notability. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 21:59, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The extradition case is notable, as are the criminal charges and fathering a child, if perhaps less so. I see plenty of mainstream news coverage in Arizona, Britain, and a mention in the New York Times. Hairhorn (talk) 04:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A cursory Google news search turns up articles in reliable sources — Arizona newspapers ([1], [2], [3], [4]), an Irish newspaper ([5]), the New York times ([6]), and US News & World Report ([7]). The articles span several years (2002 – 2006). The subject meets the general notability guideline. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk 04:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep a notable individual. Reliable sources establish same. Crafty (talk) 03:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep News articles, associations and legal precendents are notable. Lattefever (talk) 15:07, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Lattefever[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.