Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Currie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e decker ^talk 15:41, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Currie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about an actor with no strong claim of notability that would meet WP:NACTOR — his IMDB profile reveals, in fact, that even the roles that would appear to be his most notable (Battlestar Galactica and Stargate SG-1) were themselves minor walk-on roles of the "one or two episodes" variety (and even in the only role in which he got more than two episodes, his character was still so minor that he had a number instead of a name.) And the only "references" that the article has ever contained at all were his IMDB profile and an interview on a Stargate fansite — neither of which are valid reliable sources for a Wikipedia article, and since he's been almost exclusively a bit part actor to date I can confirm that Google offers up exactly squat for better sourcing. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 06:46, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I remember him as Fifth in Stargate: SG-11, but that was in just a few episodes in a short story arc. None of his other credits are enough to satisfy NACTOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:23, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 07:03, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:22, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.