Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patterns in dimesions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clearly not appropriate content. I don't think any purpose is served in leaving this open any longer, it'll just be more pile-on deletes. Fences&Windows 17:02, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Patterns in dimesions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is like an poorly written high school science paper. It is not, by any means, a Wikipedia article. Ems24 (talk) 04:39, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• DeleteI completely agree. It is not even wrong. It just doesn't belong here. SmokingNewton (talk) 04:46, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Meaningless, OR-ish drivel. caknuck _° needs to be running more often 04:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: fun but largely unencyclopedic gee-whizzery. The reference to relativity is a groaner Hairhorn (talk)
• Delete Yeah, original research. Shadowjams (talk) 05:33, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: but the author should be directed to Flatland where these ideas are done in fiction. Edward Vielmetti (talk) 05:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete very badly written. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 06:47, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. "Not even wrong" is about it. In some senses it's right, but everything in it that's right is covered elsewhere and it is written childishly. Michael Hardy (talk) 05:41, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete poorly written OR essay; nothing worth keeping. Gandalf61 (talk) 09:24, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all above. Paul August ☎ 00:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.