Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paymo Time Tracker
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Pigman☿ 02:41, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Paymo Time Tracker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Article is about non-notable software and sources provided give no in-depth coverage. TN‑X-Man 13:51, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable, author created same page twice before as Paymo and Paymo (Time Tracker). StaticGull Talk 14:14, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Tnxman307, i can call any product on that page not notable. what makes a product notabable? As long as a company is not publicly traded it can be defined as not notable. We have thousands of active users, i belive we are notable. Please be fair and remove ALL other non-notable products from the time tracking comparison table. and best of all explain define NON NOTABLE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ldimlight (talk • contribs) 14:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - please read WP:N for WP's notability criteria. – ukexpat (talk) 15:17, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Non-notable, verging on spammy. ukexpat (talk) 15:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 09:12, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.