- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Scott • talk 10:31, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- PdoMap (PHP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is written like a review. It contains no sources and all of the information appears to be original research or taken from the project page on SourceForge. I had initially reviewed this article when it was created. At the time, I had noted a few issues on its talk page that I felt needed addressed primarily of which was proving that the topic is notable.
After 3 years, a Google search still turns up almost nothing on the project beyond this Wikipedia page and its page on Sourceforge. I am fairly sure that it does not meet the notability requirements. I am also suspicious that the article was created by one of the core developers who might have a Conflict of interest. Zell Faze (talk) 20:16, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. czar · · 21:04, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm less concerned about the conflict of interest and more about the flat out lack of reliable third party coverage on the subject. AMFMUHFVHF90922 (talk) 16:56, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete' - There is no coverage in reliable sources. For that matter, there isn't even coverage in unreliable sources like blogs and web forums. -- Whpq (talk) 20:36, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is arguably very close to WP:ADVERT. Because it lacks WP:SIGCOV, it doesn't appear to be a notable piece of software (I think it's software). Mkdwtalk 06:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.