- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Singularity 09:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Peace in action (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Blatant promotion/advert; can't find any non-powder puff links to make a balanced article Minkythecat (talk) 18:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete Reads like an ad. archanamiya · talk 21:32, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unsourced, written like an ad. By looking at the history, it was most certainly written by someone in the agency. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 03:04, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam. Most of it is copied from their website verbatim so it could be arguably a copyvio as well. And in any case, there also seems to be no reliable sources writing about the group. So in summary, it's part copyvio, part spam, and not notable. -- Whpq (talk) 12:20, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 18:19, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.