- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. SynergeticMaggot 04:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Dictdef. Transwiki, anyone? Just zis Guy you know? 21:55, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I see nothing wrong with having this disambiguation page, considering that there are multiple meanings of "pectoral". alphaChimp laudare 21:59, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I just fleshed out (okay, bad pun) Abductor (disambiguation) and Adductor yesterday. We need to tie together the anatomy articles, not fragment them further. -- nae'blis 22:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. People searching for information about the different types of pectoral muscles will probably end up here first, and a simple re-direct doesn't work, due to distinction between the Pectoralis major muscle and the Pectoralis minor muscle. --Thorne N. Melcher 23:44, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above--Peephole 01:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Worthwhile dab page. --Joelmills 02:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Disambiguation pages are almost as cheap as, and more useful than, redirects. GRBerry 16:44, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.