Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peer to Peer and Human Evolution
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Peer to Peer and Human Evolution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Non-notable essay. Contested prod. Leibniz 12:15, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. MER-C 12:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable
and Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 22:07, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not OR though. It's a paper published elsewhere. — coelacan talk — 23:42, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Whoops got confused, missed the author credit for Michel Bauwens.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not OR though. It's a paper published elsewhere. — coelacan talk — 23:42, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete NN, no RS. --82.35.193.80 00:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete article fails to establish notability of idea, which is basically that social interaction, between individuals, is ummm, important... at least it might be... when dressed-up in contemporary techno-lingo... Pete.Hurd 22:50, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.