Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pemberton Square
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:27, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Pemberton Square (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable, no non-trivial secondary coverage found whatsoever. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 04:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 04:33, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Stub about a non-notable shopping mall. Maybe could have been speedied since it doesn't even claim notability - much less demonstrate it. --MelanieN (talk) 21:44, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.