Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pendleton Whisky
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 15:34, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Pendleton Whisky (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Very few reliable sources exist for the product. I would suggest incorporating the article's content into a new article, Hood River Distillers. yutsi Talk/ Contributions 17:49, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or redirect. If somebody wants to start Hood River Distillers, I agree, this could be rolled into that article and turned into a redirect. But absent that article, I can't support deletion. There are plenty of other sources, including this one which discusses how the Pendleton Roundup has played a role in making it the #1 Canadian Whisky sold in Oregon. -Pete (talk) 19:55, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The topic has received a great deal of coverage in the East Oregonian (See: Google News search); examples include: [1], [2] (there's many more). Importantly, the topic has also received regional coverage in The Portland Business Journal: Article: A premium wager. Also, since there's currently no Hood River Distillers article, a merge would be contingent on this new article being created, which there's no guarantee of actually occurring. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:24, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Definitely deserves to be kept meets the criteria Finnegas (talk) 18:51, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.