• Home
  • Random
  • Nearby
  • Log in
  • Settings
Donate Now If Wikipedia is useful to you, please give today.
  • About Wikipedia
  • Disclaimers
Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Per curium

  • Project page
  • Talk
  • Language
  • Watch
  • Edit
< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redirect. Mailer Diablo 07:03, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Per curium

edit

Completing the AfD by anon user. Kevin 03:45, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - yeah, it's never going to expand. - Richardcavell 03:53, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I change my vote to redirect (see EWS23, below) - Richardcavell 04:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. More suited to a legal dictionary. Also, it's spelled per curiam. Brian G. Crawford 04:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as nothing more than a dicdef. Its already at Wiktionary, so no need to transfer. --Hetar 04:17, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as incorrectly-spelt already-extant legal term.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  04:26, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Actually, seeing as it is a spelling mistake that seems easy enough to make (and I, a Master of Laws student, failed to pick it up), how about redirecting to per curiam as a substitute for deletion? The article already at per curiam decision has some substance to it. - Richardcavell 04:38, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • (edit conflict) Redirect to Per curiam decision (not per curiam, that would be a double redirect} as a possible misspelling. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 04:40, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per EWS23. --AbsolutDan (talk) 04:45, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per EWS23. --FRCP11 05:44, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Useful Redirect as above. ProhibitOnions 12:33, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect as above. Beno1000 14:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect from misspelling. -- stubblyhead | T/c 17:29, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per EWS23. ergot 15:02, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - I'm the original author. Sorry, don't flame me for being new at adding stuff. That was my first day of putting stuff up. Ok, and curiam is speeld the right way. Not curium. Sorry. Sorry that I didn't check the dictionary. I thought it was good, because no one else put it up. shadowj212


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Per_curium&oldid=1144980768"
Last edited on 16 March 2023, at 16:11

Languages

      This page is not available in other languages.

      Wikipedia
      • Wikimedia Foundation
      • Powered by MediaWiki
      • This page was last edited on 16 March 2023, at 16:11 (UTC).
      • Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.
      • Privacy policy
      • About Wikipedia
      • Disclaimers
      • Contact Wikipedia
      • Code of Conduct
      • Developers
      • Statistics
      • Cookie statement
      • Terms of Use
      • Desktop