- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Percy Jackson & The Olympians. Also delete; the current content is useless anyway. Sandstein 19:56, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Percy Jackson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This character does not establish notability independent of Percy Jackson & The Olympians through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 03:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I am also nominating another version of the same topic:
- Delete- nominator is correct. Neither article has any sources, or establishes the subject's notability outside the book series. Reyk YO! 07:09, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge I agree this article is useless as is, but i do not understand the nomination: i see no excessive plot summary, just a poor plot summary that seems to incomplete to represent his likely actual role. . The character is the hero, and thus very likely to be notable if the work is important. (I fail to understand the last sentence, as usual; I ask once more TTN to word it differently, as nobody has yet proposed what it means) But this whole group of articles needs some careful attention,--its being done wrong, and we should rather be conserving and merging he fragments in the hope of getting the start for one decent article on the series Ditto for all the related articles. This is not the way to build the encyclopedia--help for those working on the topic is the way. DGG (talk) 08:02, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think he means that; "no one has attempted to improve that article, and therefore probably never will". I'm not condemning or condoning this logic in this particular debate, just honestly trying to answer your question. That's just my perception of what he said, so don't shoot the messenger, peace n love. :D Ryan4314 (talk) 05:56, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per DGG. -- Mvuijlst (talk) 22:31, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Percy Jackson & The Olympians. Ryan4314 (talk) 05:56, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nothing notable here whatsoever. Eusebeus (talk) 23:44, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.