Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Performance 3000
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spellcast (talk) 16:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Performance 3000 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Motor tuning company written up by Performance-Dave. Is it notable? -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 23:46, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. Appears to fail WP:CORP.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 07:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Response by Performance-Dave:
I feel that our achievements are highly notable in the UK tuning market, while this is obviously not of interest to some or even a lot of people, our achievements are significant in the context of the area we specialise in. Therefore I don't believe that it is any less or more so notable than any other subject. There are plenty of topics and articles on Wikipedia that are of little or no interest to me and a lot of others but this does not make them any less notable or significant. We are featured in specialist car modifying and enthusiast magazines on a regular basis and are a media favourite within the field because of the unusual and sometimes pioneering work we carry out, this alone demonstrates that we are notable within the market. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Performance-Dave (talk • contribs) 10:08, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:CORP. WP:NN, WP:COI, has no WP:RS. WP:SPAM? --Evb-wiki (talk) 18:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.