Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Braithwaite Studio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:10, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Braithwaite Studio

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Available sources do not show that this company meets WP:NCORP. Mekomo (talk) 13:12, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Companies, and Canada. Mekomo (talk) 13:12, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - artists' and architects' studios are by definition run of the mill, since all of them have one. The only exceptions are world-famous studios that might are turned into postmortem museums or historic sites; in this case, too soon. The individual architects don't seem to be notable, either. As a corporate entity (?) I don't see how such a small company, which hasn't received significant coverage, could be notable. Bearian (talk) 02:12, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 13:57, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: No evidence of passing WP:ORGCRIT indeed. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:02, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.