- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 01:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Peter Bulkley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable ancestor of the Bush family. Notability is not inherited. He does not seem to have been a sufficiently notable preacher to have notability on his own. --Michael WhiteT·C 21:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep per WP:BIO seems to be a significant subject of multiple manuscripts. --Veritas (talk) 13:31, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the references are all genealogy-related if that's what you're referring to. --Michael WhiteT·C 13:46, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. His 1646 treatise The Gospel Covenant appears to have been a significant Puritan book. Discussed at length in old histories such as. He isn't here just because of his descendant. --Dhartung | Talk 19:33, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep: two of the books about him on worldcat are not genealogy related. Dsp13 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 14:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep: per Dsp13 Gareth E Kegg (talk) 01:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.