Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Fimmel Extended Nuclear Cluster model

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Fimmel Extended Nuclear Cluster model

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original research. The theory described in the article is propounded in a single article in fringe journal "Physics Essays"; the Physics Essays article has no citations; neither the author nor the theory make any appearance in the mainstream physics literature.Bm gub (talk) 02:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC) Bm gub (talk) 02:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:57, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete On Google scholar I found three cites stemming from "Extended Nuclear Cluster model", but they were all cites by the author of his own work. I also searched "Extended Nuclear Cluster model" on Google web, which has 74 hits dominated by wikipedia mirrors, and I looked at most of those hits and did not find independent secondary sources. So, the topic appears to lack the independent secondary sources required by the guidelines. Unscintillating (talk) 00:37, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Original research. I try to assume good faith but I'd be very surprised if Curiolae (talk · contribs) were not 99.185.49.158 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), and if both weren't connected somehow to Mr. Fimmel.Chick Bowen 03:32, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as original research. Jenks24 (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.