This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. NSR (talk) 12:16, 10 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
i don't think this is notable, but i could be wrong.-- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 18:17, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Notable in the history of agriculture. Keep. DS 21:48, 2 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
(and I just cleaned it up a bit more.DS 21:31, 3 September 2005 (UTC))[reply]
- Keep - The individual seems to be notable. UniReb 00:36, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Being named one of the 100 most significant contributors in history to the mechanization of agriculture and creating a company that owned over 50% of the 4WD tractor market in the 70's is not notable? Versatile, Ford Versatile, New Holland Versatile, Fiat Versatile? I suppose you really need to know farming history to understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bunge2212 (talk • contribs) 03:12, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above Sam Vimes 11:34, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.