- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:13, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Petsitting.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacks substantial coverage from independent sources Yaksar (let's chat) 06:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm finding nothing substantial other than PR and passing mentions. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 08:56, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep Bad faith nomination. Yaksar is following me around and trying to delete articles I edit. CallawayRox (talk) 18:34, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I tagged the article for notability awhile back; that hasn't changed in the meantime. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 08:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.