- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Phantasm IV Oblivion. MBisanz talk 13:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Phantasm V (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Explicitly fails future film notability guidelines. No prejudice towards recreation when reliable sources indicate that shooting has already begun. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 13:12, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect (create) to a Phantasm (film series) article. 76.66.195.63 (talk) 06:48, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge but not into non-existent articles. I have already merged the gist of the "footage" section into Phantasm IV which has a section on the sequel. And the article here should be deleted, not redirected. If that movie is ever made, it can be recreated. Str1977 (talk) 01:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect The most recent news about this movie, [1] seems to indicate that it's on hold, so it definitely seems premature for an article about it. I agree with Str1977; any truly verifiable content can go to the Phantasm IV Oblivion article for now, with this article redirected there. Raven1977 (talk) 05:03, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.